S., a frank and intelligent man, told me as follows how he ceased to believe:-
He was twenty-six years old when one day on a hunting expedition, the time for sleep having come, he set himself to pray according to the custom he had held from childhood.
His brother, who was hunting with him, lay upon the hay and looked at him. When S. had finished his prayer and was turning to sleep, the brother said, ‘Do you still keep up that thing?’ Nothing more was said. But since that day, now more than thirty years ago, S. has never prayed again; he never takes communion, and does not go to church. All this, not because he became acquainted with convictions of his brother which he then and there adopted; not because he made any new resolution in his soul, but merely because the words spoken by his brother were like the light push of a finger against a leaning wall already about to tumble by its own weight. These words but showed him that the place wherein he supposed religion dwelt in him had long been empty, and that the sentences he uttered, the crosses and bows which he made during his prayer, were actions with no inner sense. Having once seized their absurdity, he could no longer keep them up.
~Tolstoy, quoted in William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience
In old times, whenever a philosopher was assailed for some particularly tough absurdity in his system, he was wont to parry the attack by the argument from the divine omnipotence. ‘Do you mean to limit God’s power?’ he would reply: ‘do you mean to say that God could not, if he would, do this or that?’ This retort was supposed to close the mouths of all objectors of properly decorous mind. The functions of the bradleian absolute are in this particular identical with those of the theistic God. Suppositions treated as too absurd to pass muster in the finite world which we inhabit, the absolute must be able to make good ‘somehow’ in his ineffable way. First we hear Mr. Bradley convicting things of absurdity; next, calling on the absolute to vouch for them quand même. Invoked for no other duty, that duty it must and shall perform.
~William James, The Pluralistic Universe
The following is a list of all the books I’ve read from front to cover in 2013, starting from the most recently finished. The books in bold are ones that were most influential to my thinking, or particularly fascinating.
- The Gap: The Science of What Separates Us from Other Animals – Thomas Suddendorf
- The Hunger Games – Suzanne Collins
- A Manual for Creating Atheists – Boghossian, Peter
- Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World – Weisberg, Michael
- The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History – Gould, Stephen Jay
- Brain Imaging: What It Can (and Cannot) Tell Us about Consciousness – Shulman, R G
- Consciousness and the Social Brain – Graziano, Michael S A
- Wired for God?: The Biology of Spiritual Experience – Foster, Charles
- Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman – Gleick, James
- The Unpredictable Species – Lieberman, Philip
- The God Argument: The Case against Religion and for Humanism – Grayling, A.C.
- Stumbling on Happiness – Gilbert, Daniel
- The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why – Nisbett, Richard E.
- Civilization and Its Discontents – Freud, Sigmund
- The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature – Miller, Geoffrey
- Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content – Hutto, Daniel D.
- Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength – Baumeister, Roy F.
- Beyond Good and Evil – Nietzsche, Friedrich
- Marriage Confidential: The Post-Romantic Age of Workhorse Wives, Royal Children, Undersexed Spouses, and Rebel Couples Who Are Rewriting the Rules – Haag, Pamela
- Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking – Hofstadter, Douglas R.
- The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home – Ariely, Dan
- The Future of an Illusion – Freud, Sigmund
- Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets – Taleb, Nassim Nicholas
- How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed – Kurzweil, Ray
- On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic – Nietzsche, Friedrich
- The Mind-Body Problem – Goldstein, Rebecca Newberger
- The Marvelous Learning Animal: What Makes Human Behavior Unique – Staats, Arthur W.
- Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order – Strogatz, Steven H.
- The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and Social Life – Baumeister, Roy F.
- Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False – Nagel, Thomas
- The Social Construction of What? – Hacking, Ian
- 36 Arguments for the Existence of God: A Work of Fiction – Goldstein, Rebecca Newberger
- Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers – Roach, Mary
- Monkey Mind: A Memoir of Anxiety – Smith, Daniel B.
- The Minds of the Bible: Speculations on the Cultural Evolution of Human Consciousness – Cohn, James
- Brain on Fire: My Month of Madness – Cahalan, Susannah
- What a Plant Knows: A Field Guide to the Senses – Chamovitz, Daniel
- Reconstruction in Philosophy – Dewey, John
- Against All Gods: Six Polemics on Religion and an Essay on Kindness – Grayling, A.C.
- The Logic Of Modern Physics – Bridgman, Percy W.
- The End of Christianity – Loftus, John W.
- Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress – Chang, Hasok
- The New Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes in a Complex World – Goldberg, Elkhonon
- Thomas Jefferson: Author of America – Hitchens, Christopher
- Born Believers: The Science of Children’s Religious Belief – Barrett, Justin L.
- Brains: How They Seem to Work – Purves, Dale
- A Man Without Words – Schaller, Susan
- Beyond Morality – Garner, Richard
- Hallucinations – Sacks, Oliver
- The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail – But Some Don’t – Silver, Nate
- Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder – Taleb, Nassim Nicholas
- The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood – Gleick, James
- Ubik – Dick, Philip K.
- The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution – Dutton, Denis
Filed under Books, Random
“Habit is thus a second nature, or rather, as the Duke of Wellington said, it is ‘ten times nature,’–at any rate as regards its importance in adult life; for the acquired habits of our training have by that time inhibited or strangled most of the natural impulsive tendencies which were originally there. Ninety-nine hundredths or, possibly, nine hundred and ninety-nine thousandths of our activity is purely automatic and habitual, from our rising in the morning to our lying down each night. Our dressing and undressing, our eating and drinking, our greetings and partings, our hat-raisings and giving way for ladies to precede, nay, even most of the forms of our common speech, are things of a type so fixed by repetition as almost to be classed as reflex actions. To each sort of impression we have an automatic, ready-made response. My very words to you now are an example of what I mean; for having already lectured upon habit and printed a chapter about it in a book, and read the latter when in print, I find my tongue inevitably falling into its old phrases and repeating almost literally what I said before.”
~William James, Talks to Teachers on Psychology: and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals
As Steven Pinker observes, the logic of loyalty is particularly clear in the domain of romantic relationships: You’re a great catch, but there is bound to be someone out there who’s got everything you’ve got plus a little more. Knowing that your partner might someday meet such a person, you’d be reassured by the knowledge that your partner isn’t going to leave you as soon as something better comes along. This would make you much more willing to settle down with your partner and start a family–a high-stakes cooperative endeavor if ever there was one. It’s wonderful that your partner fully appreciates your many marketable qualities, but that may not be enough to keep you together. What you really want is for your partner to have a deep, unshakable desire to be with you and you alone. In short, you want your partner to love you, to want you not only for your wonderful qualities but just because you’re you. Only love provides the kind of loyalty you need in order to take the parenting plunge. Thus, love appears to be more than just an intense form of caring. It’s a highly specialized piece of psychological machinery, an emotional straitjacket that enables cooperative parenting by assuring our parenting partners that they won’t be abandoned.
~Joshua Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them (2013), p. 42
If we were to interpret the lives of animals with a human eye, we would conclude that they are in flow most of the time because their perception of what has to be done generally coincides with that they are prepared to do. When a lion feels hungry, it will start grumbling and looking for prey until its hunger is satisfied; afterward it lies down to bask in the sun, dreaming the dreams lions dream. There is no reason to believe that it suffers from unfulfilled ambition, or that it is over-whelmed by pressing responsibilities. Animals’ skills are always matched to concrete demands because their minds, such as they are, only contain information about what is actually present in the environment in relation to their bodily states, as determined by instinct. So a hungry lion only perceives what will help it to find a gazelle, while a sated lion concentrates fully on the warmth of the sun. Its mind does not weigh possibilities unavailable at the moment; it neither imagines pleasant alternatives, nor is it disturbed by fears of failure.
~ Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, Flow (1991), p. 227-228